MARKON BLEND LETT/ROM 80/20 WITH SEP BAGGIES 4/5# Iceberg, Romaine, Carrots, Red Cabbage…
Taylor Farms de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 19 August 2026 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Potential Cyclospora contamination.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- MARKON BLEND LETT/ROM 80/20 WITH SEP BAGGIES 4/5# Iceberg, Romaine, Carrots, Red Cabbage products.
- Reason for recall
- Potential Cyclospora contamination.
- Recalling firm
- Taylor Farms de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
- Firm location
- Doctor Mora, Mexico
- Classification
- Class I
- Status
- Ongoing
- Recall number
- H-1298-2026
- Quantity
- 855 cases
- Distribution
- Domestic: AL, AR, CT, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI, MO, MS, NC, NH, NJ, OH, OK, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, and WI. (Subway distribution limited to: AR, LA, and TX) Foreign: Mexico.
- Initiated
- 17 July 2026
- Reported by FDA
- 19 August 2026
- Firm notified by
- Two or more of the following: Email, Fax, Letter, Press Release, Telephone, Visit
- Product codes
- MARKON BLEND LETT/ROM 80/20 WITH SEP BAGGIES 4/5# TFMX183A05 7/21/2026 TFMX184A02 7/22/2026 TFMX187B02 7/25/2026 TFMX189A03 7/27/2026 TFMX190A03 7/28/2026 TFMX190B01 7/28/2026 TFMX191A02 7/29/2026 TFMX194B02 8/1/2026
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This is one of 21 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 21 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 21. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 21 of them.
- This recall has no termination date on the record, so as published it had not been terminated under 21 CFR 7.55.
- The distribution pattern names 25 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 weeks after the firm began the recall.
- Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Named in the distribution pattern: Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
What this recall was for
Viral and parasitic contamination
Hepatitis A, norovirus and Cyclospora recalls trace back to a person or to water rather than to the process: an infected food handler, or produce irrigated or washed with contaminated water.
A preventive controls plan covers viral or parasitic contamination under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
- 21 CFR 117.10
- Personnel: the hygiene practices, and the exclusion of anyone with an illness or open lesion that could contaminate food, that a facility must require.
- 21 CFR 112
- Produce safety: the agricultural water, worker health and hygiene standards for farms growing produce eaten raw.
- 21 CFR 117 subpart G
- Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
Filed under fresh produce. A product can sit in more than one.
Other fresh produce recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Other records from Taylor Farms de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event. 20 other records name this firm.
All 21 records for Taylor Farms de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
All 2026 recalls · All FDA food recall data
21 CFR 117.10 is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.