Huberts Original Lemonade, 16 Fl. Oz. (473 ml), Manufactured for: Hamsen Beverage…
Coca-Cola Company (The) recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 28 September 2016 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. The product may contain foreign material (glass) in some bottles.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- Huberts Original Lemonade, 16 Fl. Oz. (473 ml), Manufactured for: Hamsen Beverage, Tustin, CA 92780.
- Reason for recall
- The product may contain foreign material (glass) in some bottles.
- Recalling firm
- Coca-Cola Company (The)
- Firm location
- Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Classification
- Class II
- Status
- Terminated
- Recall number
- F-2397-2016
- Quantity
- 53, 823 cases (12/16oz. glass bottles per case)
- Distribution
- CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, IO, IL, IN, ME, MI, MN, MS, NC, NH, NJ, NY, PA, TN, TX, VA, WA, and WI.
- Initiated
- 1 July 2016
- Reported by FDA
- 28 September 2016
- Terminated
- 7 February 2017
- Firm notified by
- Two or more of the following: Email, Fax, Letter, Press Release, Telephone, Visit
- Product codes
- Date Code: D1626UB
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This is one of 4 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 4 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 4. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 4 of them.
- The recall ran for 7 months, from 1 July 2016 to termination on 7 February 2017. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
- The distribution pattern names 22 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 3 months after the firm began the recall.
- Recalls of a beverage or juice run a median of 6 months, so this one was about typical for its category. Juice is the other food with its own HACCP regulation in the United States, 21 CFR part 120, which requires a treatment achieving a 5-log reduction of the pertinent pathogen, and unpasteurised juice recalls are almost always a failure of that step or an exemption misapplied.
Named in the distribution pattern: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
What this recall was for
Foreign material
A foreign material recall means something that is not food was found in food: metal, plastic, glass, wood or insect matter, usually shed by equipment during processing.
A preventive controls plan covers foreign material under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
- 21 CFR 117.40
- Equipment and utensils: plant equipment designed and maintained so it cannot contaminate food with lubricants, fuel, metal fragments or contaminated water.
- 21 CFR 117.80(c)
- Manufacturing operations: the measures that protect food from contamination during processing, including the effective ones against metal and other extraneous material.
- 21 CFR 117.150
- Corrective actions: what a facility does when a preventive control was not properly implemented, including identifying and correcting the problem and evaluating the food for safety.
Filed under beverages and juice. A product can sit in more than one.
Other beverages and juice recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Other records from Coca-Cola Company (The)
The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event. 13 other records name this firm.
All 14 records for Coca-Cola Company (The)
All 2016 recalls · All FDA food recall data
21 CFR 117.40 is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.