Multivitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets Grape Flavor Rx NDC 75826-169-10 0.25 mg 100…
Winder Laboratories, LLC recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 25 March 2026 as Class III. The recall was initiated by the firm. Subpotent. During an FDA inspection it was discovered that the product was subpotent for Vitamin D.

The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- Multivitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets Grape Flavor Rx NDC 75826-169-10 0.25 mg 100 TABLETS UPC 3 15826 16910 2; NDC 75826-171-10 1mg 100 TABLETS UPC 3 15826 17110 5 Manufactured by: WINDER LABORATORIES LLC Winder, GA 30680
- UPC
- 315826169102
- Reason for recall
- Subpotent. During an FDA inspection it was discovered that the product was subpotent for Vitamin D.
- Recalling firm
- Winder Laboratories, LLC
- Firm location
- Winder, Georgia, United States
- Classification
- Class III
- Status
- Ongoing
- Recall number
- H-0569-2026
- Quantity
- 422cs/12/0.25mg/100ct bottles + 210cs/12/1.0mg/100ct bottles
- Distribution
- Product was shipped to the following states: AL, AZ, CA, FL, HI, IA, IL, IN, MA, MI, MO, MS, NC, NJ, NY, OR, PA, PR, RI, TN, TX, UT, WA, WI & WV.
- Initiated
- 27 October 2025
- Reported by FDA
- 25 March 2026
- Firm notified by
- Letter
- Product codes
- Lot 1692303 SN: 138909557498 EXP: 2025-10-26 & Lot 1692304 SN 131163901709 EXP: 2025-10-26; LOT 1712301 SN: 163590222021 EXP: 2025-11-14
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class III means the FDA judged that the product was unlikely to cause harm but violated FDA labelling or manufacturing regulation. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This record is the only one the FDA opened for its recall event, so it covers a single product code.
- This recall has no termination date on the record, so as published it had not been terminated under 21 CFR 7.55.
- The distribution pattern names 22 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 months after the firm began the recall.
- Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Named in the distribution pattern: Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
Filed under fresh produce and dietary supplements. A product can sit in more than one.
Other fresh produce recalls
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
All 2026 recalls · All FDA food recall data
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.