The Tuna Salad product container is mislabeled with a Chicken Salad lid, which states…
Reser's Fine Foods, Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 25 February 2026 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Undeclared fish allergen (tuna). Tuna Salad was mislabeled as Chicken Salad.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
The Tuna Salad product container is mislabeled with a Chicken Salad lid, which states: Molly Kitchen's Chicken Salad, 789953, NET WT. 5 LB (2.26 kg) per plastic tub. UPC 7 5810830149 8. Distributed by US Foods, Inc. Rosemont, IL 60018. The lid declares Contains: Eggs, Milk, Wheat. The immediate 5-lb tub has no side labeling (besides the lid). The master cardboard case label is correct and states: Molly Kitchen's Tuna Salad, (item #) 794599, 2/5 LB tubs per case, Net Wt. 10 LB (4.53 kg). UPC 075810876447. Distributed by US Foods, Inc. Rosemont, IL 60018. Contains: Egg, Wheat, Fish (Tuna).
UPC
758108301498
Reason for recall
Undeclared fish allergen (tuna). Tuna Salad was mislabeled as Chicken Salad.
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This record is the only one the FDA opened for its recall event, so it covers a single product code.
The recall ran for 2 months, from 30 January 2026 to termination on 14 April 2026. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The distribution pattern names 4 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 4 weeks after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of milk or a dairy product run a median of 7 months, so this one was shorter than usual for its category. Dairy recalls split between pathogen contamination in products that skipped or under-ran pasteurisation and undeclared milk in products that should never have contained it, which is the same allergen viewed from two directions.
Named in the distribution pattern: California, Nevada, Utah, Washington. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
An undeclared allergen recall means a food contained one of the major allergens and the label did not say so, either because the wrong label was applied or because an ingredient carried an allergen nobody traced.
A preventive controls plan covers an undeclared allergen under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(2)
Food allergen controls: the written preventive controls that keep an allergen out of a food it does not belong in, and that get the allergens present onto the label.
21 CFR 101.4
Ingredient declaration: every ingredient listed by its common name, in descending order of predominance, on the label of a packaged food.
21 CFR 117 subpart G
Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Undeclared Soy. The firm received complaints of sausage in the burritos. Upon review the firm discovered the sausage contains soy which is not listed on the label.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
Tuna Salad products are recalled due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes because products containing Newly Weds Foods recalled Japanese Style Breadcrumbs.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(2) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
