Tanimura & Antle brand Romaine lettuce. 1 head 12,15,018 and 24 case Product of USA UPC…
Tanimura & Antle recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 9 December 2020 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development found E.coli O157:H7 in romaine lettuce during routine sampling.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- Tanimura & Antle brand Romaine lettuce. 1 head 12,15,018 and 24 case Product of USA UPC: 2-27918 20314-9 Tanimura & Antle, Salinas, CA
- UPC
- 227918203149
- Reason for recall
- Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development found E.coli O157:H7 in romaine lettuce during routine sampling.
- Recalling firm
- Tanimura & Antle
- Firm location
- Salinas, California, United States
- Classification
- Class I
- Status
- Terminated
- Recall number
- F-0145-2021
- Quantity
- 3396 cases
- Distribution
- AK, OR, CA, TX, WI, AR, OK, IN, NE, MO, TN, WI, NM, SC, WA, NC, OH, PR, IL, MI
- Initiated
- 6 November 2020
- Reported by FDA
- 9 December 2020
- Terminated
- 9 December 2020
- Firm notified by
- Press Release
- Product codes
- Pack date of 10/15/2020 or 10/16/2020 Product Traceability Initiative (PTI) 571280289SRS1 (10/15) and 571280290SRS1 (10/16).
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This record is the only one the FDA opened for its recall event, so it covers a single product code.
- The recall ran for 5 weeks, from 6 November 2020 to termination on 9 December 2020. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
- The distribution pattern names 19 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 weeks after the firm began the recall.
- Recalls of fresh produce run a median of 7 months, so this one was shorter than usual for its category. Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Named in the distribution pattern: Alaska, Oregon, California, Texas, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Indiana, Nebraska, Missouri, Tennessee, New Mexico, South Carolina, Washington, North Carolina, Ohio, Puerto Rico, Illinois, Michigan. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
What this recall was for
E. coli
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli recalls concentrate in foods eaten raw or lightly cooked, where no step in the process is hot enough or long enough to be a kill step.
A preventive controls plan covers E. coli contamination under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
- 21 CFR 117.135(c)(1)
- Process controls: the controls that apply a treatment, such as a validated kill step, at the point where it reduces the hazard to a safe level.
- 21 CFR 117 subpart G
- Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
- 21 CFR 120
- Juice HACCP: the hazard analysis and critical control point system required for juice processors, including a treatment achieving a 5-log pathogen reduction.
Filed under fresh produce. A product can sit in more than one.
Other fresh produce recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Other records from Tanimura & Antle
The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event.
| Reported | Product | Firm | Reason | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-09-05 | Tanimura & Antle Romaine Lettuce (Laitue Romaine) in plastic bag Wrapped Single Head Romaine marked Field Packed for Freshness.. Distributed by Tanimura & Antle, Salinas, CA. | Tanimura & Antle | FDA was notified by CFIA of a positive result for E-cole O157:H7 in Romaine Lettuce with the brand name of Tanimura & Antle, Salinas, CA. | Class I |
All 2020 recalls · All FDA food recall data
21 CFR 117.135(c)(1) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.