Tops GOLD Mango Pickle NET QTY.: 31.74oz PRODUCT OF INDIA UPC: 8904288611373…
Mangalm LLC recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 1 April 2026 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. Potential adulteration with erucic acid from mustard oil ingredient.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
Tops GOLD Mango Pickle NET QTY.: 31.74oz PRODUCT OF INDIA UPC: 8904288611373 INGREDIENTS:***Mustard Oil*** Tops GOLD Mango Pickle NET QTY.: 158.73oz PRODUCT OF INDIA UPC: 8904288611915; 8904288613025 INGREDIENTS:***Mustard Oil***
UPC
8904288611373
Reason for recall
Potential adulteration with erucic acid from mustard oil ingredient.
40 cases (12 - 31.74 oz. cans/case); 40 cases (2 - 158.73 oz. cans/case)
Distribution
U.S. Distribution: CA, NV, OR, UT, WA. Foreign Distribution: None.
Initiated
24 January 2026
Reported by FDA
1 April 2026
Firm notified by
E-Mail
Product codes
UPC: 8904288611373; 8904288611915
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 6 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 6 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 6. All 6 of them are listed on this page.
This recall has no termination date on the record, so as published it had not been terminated under 21 CFR 7.55.
The distribution pattern names 3 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 2 months after the firm began the recall.
Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Named in the distribution pattern: Nevada, Oregon, Utah. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
An unapproved ingredient recall means a product contained a substance not permitted in food, most often an undisclosed pharmaceutical active found in a dietary supplement.
A preventive controls plan covers an unapproved ingredient under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
21 CFR 111
Dietary supplement CGMP: the identity, purity, strength and composition specifications a supplement manufacturer sets and verifies for every component and finished batch.
21 CFR 117 subpart G
Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
The FDA opened 6 enforcement records for this one recall, one per product code. This page carries all of them; the 5 below each have their own page with that product’s lot codes and distribution, and search engines are pointed here for the recall as a whole.
Potential adulteration with erucic acid from mustard oil ingredient.
Class II
Other fresh produce recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
21 CFR 111 is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
