Class IITerminated · reported 2016-06-22

12 RND M.C. (No Trans), For Bake, Net Weight 46.2 lbs/20.96 kg.

CSM Bakery Products NA recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 22 June 2016 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. Undeclared allergen; Peanut protein.

The record

Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.

Product
12 RND M.C. (No Trans), For Bake, Net Weight 46.2 lbs/20.96 kg.
Reason for recall
Undeclared allergen; Peanut protein.
Firm location
Tucker, Georgia, United States
Classification
Class II
Status
Terminated
Recall number
F-1479-2016
Quantity
34,525 total cases
Distribution
AZ, CA, CO, FL, IL, KY, ME, MN, NC, NJ, NY, NV, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, UT, and WI; Foreign accounts: Columbia.
Initiated
19 April 2016
Reported by FDA
22 June 2016
Terminated
17 July 2017
Firm notified by
Letter
Product codes
Batch: 1000145825, 1000149001 and 10000158800, Material number: 10194735.

Reading this record

Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.

  • Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
  • The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
  • This is one of 42 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 42 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 42. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 42 of them.
  • The recall ran for 15 months, from 19 April 2016 to termination on 17 July 2017. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
  • The distribution pattern names 19 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 2 months after the firm began the recall.
  • The product description on this record names no food this site can classify, so it appears on no food-type page. That is a limit of the description rather than of the recall.

Named in the distribution pattern: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.

What this recall was for

Undeclared allergens

An undeclared allergen recall means a food contained one of the major allergens and the label did not say so, either because the wrong label was applied or because an ingredient carried an allergen nobody traced.

A preventive controls plan covers an undeclared allergen under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.

21 CFR 117.135(c)(2)
Food allergen controls: the written preventive controls that keep an allergen out of a food it does not belong in, and that get the allergens present onto the label.
21 CFR 101.4
Ingredient declaration: every ingredient listed by its common name, in descending order of predominance, on the label of a packaged food.
21 CFR 117 subpart G
Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.

The allergens named in this record: peanuts.

Other records from CSM Bakery Products NA

The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event. 67 other records name this firm.

ReportedProductFirmReasonClass
2016-11-30BM Westco Sup-R-Roll Donut Mix, 50#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30Buffets Corn Muffin Mix, 30# BagCSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30Copack Choccupcake Base 51.5#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30Yeast Roll Mix 20# (Bromated Free)CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30BM Westco New Horizon Yrd Mix, 50#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-3011644 Ultra Rich Creme Cake Mix, 50#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-307-Eleven Spice Cookie Base, 50#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-3038260 Cream Cake Mix, 50#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30Logans Rdhse Yeast Roll Mix, 21.5#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II
2016-11-30ZT Carrot Bread Mix, 13.5#CSM Bakery Products NAUndeclared allergen; Peanut ProteinClass II

All 68 records for CSM Bakery Products NA

All 2016 recalls · All FDA food recall data

21 CFR 117.135(c)(2) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.

Early access

Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.