SunRidge Organic Crunchy Peanut Butter without salt Packed in 35 pound tub UPC code…
Falcon Trading Co., Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 31 October 2012 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Falcon Trading Company Inc. used peanut butter in their products that is now under recall by Sunland Inc. due to potential Salmonella contamination.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- SunRidge Organic Crunchy Peanut Butter without salt Packed in 35 pound tub UPC code: 086700161869 Manufactured by Falcon Trading Company, Inc. dba SunRidge Farms 423 Salinas Road Royal Oaks, CA 95076
- Reason for recall
- Falcon Trading Company Inc. used peanut butter in their products that is now under recall by Sunland Inc. due to potential Salmonella contamination.
- Recalling firm
- Falcon Trading Co., Inc.
- Firm location
- Pajaro, California, United States
- Classification
- Class I
- Status
- Terminated
- Recall number
- F-0326-2013
- Quantity
- N/A
- Distribution
- CA, GA, WA, MT, TX, LA, PA, FL, OK, IN, CO, AZ and Canada
- Initiated
- 25 September 2012
- Reported by FDA
- 31 October 2012
- Terminated
- 14 March 2013
- Firm notified by
- Press Release
- Product codes
- Item code: 016186; All Lot codes
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This is one of 7 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 7 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 7. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 7 of them.
- The recall ran for 6 months, from 25 September 2012 to termination on 14 March 2013. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
- The distribution pattern names 12 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 weeks after the firm began the recall.
- Recalls of milk or a dairy product run a median of 7 months, so this one was about typical for its category. Dairy recalls split between pathogen contamination in products that skipped or under-ran pasteurisation and undeclared milk in products that should never have contained it, which is the same allergen viewed from two directions.
Named in the distribution pattern: California, Georgia, Washington, Montana, Texas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Florida, Oklahoma, Indiana, Colorado, Arizona. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
What this recall was for
Salmonella
Salmonella is a bacterium that survives in low-moisture foods for months, which is why it appears in recalls of products that carry no water for it to grow in: nut butters, spices, flour and dry pet food.
A preventive controls plan covers Salmonella contamination under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
- 21 CFR 117.135(c)(1)
- Process controls: the controls that apply a treatment, such as a validated kill step, at the point where it reduces the hazard to a safe level.
- 21 CFR 117 subpart G
- Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
- 21 CFR 117.165(a)(2)
- Product testing: testing as a verification activity, appropriate to the facility, the food and the nature of the preventive control.
Filed under milk and dairy, nuts and seeds and spices and seasonings. A product can sit in more than one.
Other milk and dairy recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Other records from Falcon Trading Co., Inc.
The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event. 11 other records name this firm.
All 12 records for Falcon Trading Co., Inc.
All 2012 recalls · All FDA food recall data
21 CFR 117.135(c)(1) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.