Nana's Been a Nut Bread NET WT. 11oz/311.74g cloth bag CONTAINS WHEAT AND SOY.
Gullah Gourmet, Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 23 October 2019 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. The product ingredient statement does not list walnuts in the product.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- Nana's Been a Nut Bread NET WT. 11oz/311.74g cloth bag CONTAINS WHEAT AND SOY. MADE ON EQUIPMENT THAT MAKES PRODUCTS CONTAINING WHEAT, EGGS, MILK, SOY AND TREE NUTS. GULLAH BOURMET Inc. CHARLESTON, SC 29407 UPC 6 50305 01045 9
- UPC
- 650305010459
- Reason for recall
- The product ingredient statement does not list walnuts in the product.
- Recalling firm
- Gullah Gourmet, Inc.
- Firm location
- Charleston, South Carolina, United States
- Classification
- Class II
- Status
- Ongoing
- Recall number
- F-0036-2020
- Quantity
- 673/11 oz bags
- Distribution
- Product was distributed to the following states: AL, FL, GA, IN, KY, LA, MD, MN, MS, NC, NY, OH, PA, SC, TN & VA.
- Initiated
- 4 October 2019
- Reported by FDA
- 23 October 2019
- Firm notified by
- Letter
- Product codes
- Item #: 1045. Expiration date 01/30/2020
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This record is the only one the FDA opened for its recall event, so it covers a single product code.
- This recall has no termination date on the record, so as published it had not been terminated under 21 CFR 7.55.
- The distribution pattern names 13 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 3 weeks after the firm began the recall.
- Dairy recalls split between pathogen contamination in products that skipped or under-ran pasteurisation and undeclared milk in products that should never have contained it, which is the same allergen viewed from two directions.
Named in the distribution pattern: Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, North Carolina, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
Filed under milk and dairy, bakery, nuts and seeds and eggs. A product can sit in more than one.
Other milk and dairy recalls
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
All 2019 recalls · All FDA food recall data
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.