Raw & Unfiltered Bee Well Wildflower Honey NET wT. 12 OZ (340g) UPC 8 32587 00003 2, NET…
Bee Well Honey Farm & Supply Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 22 April 2026 as Class III. The recall was initiated by the firm. High sugar content. The firm was notified by the FDA that sample results were positive for a high C4 sugar content.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
Raw & Unfiltered Bee Well Wildflower Honey NET wT. 12 OZ (340g) UPC 8 32587 00003 2, NET WT. 22 OZ (624g) UPC 8 32587 00002 5 & NET WT. 44 OZ (1.25g) UPC 8 32587 00001 8 100% Pure Honey Bee Well Honey 909 W. Main Street Pickens, SC 29671
UPC
832587000032
Reason for recall
High sugar content. The firm was notified by the FDA that sample results were positive for a high C4 sugar content.
Recalling firm
Bee Well Honey Farm & Supply Inc.
Firm location
Pickens, South Carolina, United States
Classification
Class III
Status
Terminated
Recall number
H-0664-2026
Quantity
13cs/36/12oz bears, 86 cs/12/22oz jars and 64cs/12/44oz jars
Distribution
Product was shipped to retailers in South Carolina.
Initiated
20 March 2026
Reported by FDA
22 April 2026
Terminated
18 May 2026
Firm notified by
Letter
Product codes
7/24/29
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class III means the FDA judged that the product was unlikely to cause harm but violated FDA labelling or manufacturing regulation. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This record is the only one the FDA opened for its recall event, so it covers a single product code.
The recall ran for 8 weeks, from 20 March 2026 to termination on 18 May 2026. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The FDA published the enforcement report 5 weeks after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of a sauce, dip or condiment run a median of 6 months, so this one was shorter than usual for its category. Sauces and dips sit at the intersection of the acidified foods rule and the allergen rule: an equilibrium pH above 4.6 turns a shelf-stable product into a botulism risk, and the ingredient list is long enough that an allergen is easy to lose.
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
