Iced Raspberry cake with creamy filling, packaged as Hostess Zingers Raspberry in 10-ct…
Hostess Brands, LLC recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 21 September 2016 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. Product is manufactured with flour known to contain peanut allergen and is not labeled to contain peanuts.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
- Product
- Iced Raspberry cake with creamy filling, packaged as Hostess Zingers Raspberry in 10-ct multi-packs of individual cakes, net wt. 13.40oz (360 g), UPC 888109110604; 6-ct. single serving fun size snack packs, 3 cakes per pack net wt. 4.02oz. (108g), UPC 888109010089; with the responsible firm name on the label is Hostess Brands LLC, Kansas City, MO 64141.
- UPC
- 888109110604
- Reason for recall
- Product is manufactured with flour known to contain peanut allergen and is not labeled to contain peanuts.
- Recalling firm
- Hostess Brands, LLC
- Firm location
- Kansas City, Missouri, United States
- Classification
- Class II
- Status
- Terminated
- Recall number
- F-2117-2016
- Quantity
- 553,056 units
- Distribution
- Nationwide distribution. No foreign or military/government distribution.
- Initiated
- 3 June 2016
- Reported by FDA
- 21 September 2016
- Terminated
- 1 December 2017
- Firm notified by
- Two or more of the following: Email, Fax, Letter, Press Release, Telephone, Visit
- Product codes
- batch and best by date per UPC: UPC 888109110604: D040924000, best by 6/13/2016; D041024000, best by 6/14/2016; D041524000, best by 6/19/2016; D041624000, best by 6/20/2016; D040924000 (frozen), best by N/A; D041524000 (frozen), best by N/A UPC 888109010089: D041024000, best by 6/14/2016; D041524000, best by 6/19/2016; D041624000, best by 6/20/2016; D040924000 (frozen), best by N/A; D041024000 (frozen), best by N/A; D041524000 (frozen), best by N/A.
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
- Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
- The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
- This is one of 11 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 11 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 11. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 11 of them.
- The recall ran for 18 months, from 3 June 2016 to termination on 1 December 2017. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
- The FDA published the enforcement report 4 months after the firm began the recall.
- Recalls of fresh produce run a median of 7 months, so this one was longer than usual for its category. Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Filed under fresh produce, bakery and snacks and confectionery. A product can sit in more than one.
Other fresh produce recalls
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Other records from Hostess Brands, LLC
The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so several of these are frequently one recall event. 22 other records name this firm.
All 23 records for Hostess Brands, LLC
All 2016 recalls · All FDA food recall data
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Early accessRecall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.