Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough in the following packaging configurations 1) Item 03-3003…
Aspen Hills, Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 25 January 2017 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Product potentially contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough in the following packaging configurations 1) Item 03-3003 NET WT. 30 lb (13.61 kg), Aspen Hills, Inc. Garner, IA 50438; 2) 03-300 NET WT. 10 lb (4.54 kg), Aspen Hills, Inc. Garner, IA 50438; 3) 03-300 NET WT. 10 lb (4.54 kg),
Reason for recall
Product potentially contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes
Recalled product was distributed to the following US states: AL, AZ, CA, GA, IA, IL, FL, KY, MA, MI, MN, MO, OH, OK, PA, TN, TX, UT, and WI. Recalled product was also sent to Canada.
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 19 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 19 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 19. All 19 of them are listed on this page.
The recall ran for 2.1 years, from 20 September 2016 to termination on 12 October 2018. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The distribution pattern names 17 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 4 months after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of a bakery product run a median of 6 months, so this one was longer than usual for its category. Bakery is overwhelmingly an allergen category rather than a pathogen one: baking is a kill step, but a bakery runs many recipes down shared lines, so the failure that recalls a bakery product is usually a label or a changeover.
Listeria monocytogenes is a bacterium that grows at refrigeration temperature, which is why it dominates recalls of ready-to-eat foods that are never cooked again before they are eaten.
A preventive controls plan covers Listeria contamination under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(3)
Sanitation controls: the controls on cleaning food-contact surfaces and on preventing cross-contact and cross-contamination from insanitary objects, people and equipment.
21 CFR 117.165(a)(3)
Environmental monitoring: testing the processing environment for an environmental pathogen, required when a ready-to-eat food is exposed to the environment before packaging.
21 CFR 117.150
Corrective actions: what a facility does when a preventive control was not properly implemented, including identifying and correcting the problem and evaluating the food for safety.
The FDA opened 19 enforcement records for this one recall, one per product code. This page carries all of them; the 18 below each have their own page with that product’s lot codes and distribution, and search engines are pointed here for the recall as a whole.
Product potentially contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes
Class I
Other bakery recalls for the same reason
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(3) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
