House MADE Sriracha Sauce NET WT. 8 oz (237 mL) INGREDIENTS: THAI CHILIES, DISTILLED…
Garden Harvest recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 20 January 2016 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. The firm was manufacturing acidified foods without a license.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
House MADE Sriracha Sauce NET WT. 8 oz (237 mL) INGREDIENTS: THAI CHILIES, DISTILLED VINEGAR, SUGARS, GARLIC, MOLASSES, KOSHER SALT. www.housemadesriracha.com UPC 6 12524 99999 1
UPC
612524999991
Reason for recall
The firm was manufacturing acidified foods without a license.
Product was shipped to the following states: OH, FL, WV
Initiated
12 August 2015
Reported by FDA
20 January 2016
Terminated
26 February 2019
Firm notified by
E-Mail
Product codes
Lot# 52485
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 32 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 32 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 32. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 32 of them.
The recall ran for 3.5 years, from 12 August 2015 to termination on 26 February 2019. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The distribution pattern names 2 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 months after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of a sauce, dip or condiment run a median of 6 months, so this one was longer than usual for its category. Sauces and dips sit at the intersection of the acidified foods rule and the allergen rule: an equilibrium pH above 4.6 turns a shelf-stable product into a botulism risk, and the ingredient list is long enough that an allergen is easy to lose.
Named in the distribution pattern: Florida, West Virginia. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
