CANYON BAKEHOUSE GLUTEN MOUNTAIN WHITE BREAD NET WT. 18oz (1lb 2oz) 510g Canyon…
Flowers Foods (Corporate Offices) recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 30 December 2020 as Class II. The recall was initiated by the firm. The firm discovered that some of their products showed higher than acceptable levels of gluten. They placed the product on hold for destruction however, one shipper sent products into commerce for distribution.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
CANYON BAKEHOUSE GLUTEN MOUNTAIN WHITE BREAD NET WT. 18oz (1lb 2oz) 510g Canyon Bakehouse, LLC Johnstown, CO 80534 UPC 8 53584 00200 3
UPC
853584002003
Reason for recall
The firm discovered that some of their products showed higher than acceptable levels of gluten. They placed the product on hold for destruction however, one shipper sent products into commerce for distribution.
Product was shipped to the following states: AR, CO, CT, KS, LA, MA, MO, MS, MT, NE, NM, NY, OK, RI, SD, TX, UT & WY.
Initiated
2 December 2020
Reported by FDA
30 December 2020
Terminated
22 June 2021
Firm notified by
Press Release
Product codes
Lot #032220323
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class II means the FDA judged a remote probability of serious harm, or a probability of temporary or medically reversible harm. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 2 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 2 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 2. All 2 of them are listed on this page.
The recall ran for 7 months, from 2 December 2020 to termination on 22 June 2021. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The distribution pattern names 15 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 4 weeks after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of a bakery product run a median of 6 months, so this one was about typical for its category. Bakery is overwhelmingly an allergen category rather than a pathogen one: baking is a kill step, but a bakery runs many recipes down shared lines, so the failure that recalls a bakery product is usually a label or a changeover.
Filed under bakery. A product can sit in more than one.
Every product in this recall
The FDA opened 2 enforcement records for this one recall, one per product code. This page carries all of them; the 1 below each have their own page with that product’s lot codes and distribution, and search engines are pointed here for the recall as a whole.
The firm discovered that some of their products showed higher than acceptable levels of gluten. They placed the product on hold for destruction however, one shipper sent products into commerce for distribution.
Class II
Other bakery recalls
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
The firm discovered that certain units shipped to the U.S. retail stores only has "foreign languages" on the label. Product has undeclared wheat, soy, milk, eggs and tree nut (coconut).
The firm discovered that certain units shipped to the U.S. retail stores only has "foreign languages" on the label. Product has undeclared wheat, soy, milk, eggs and tree nut (coconut).
Undeclared Soy. The firm received complaints of sausage in the burritos. Upon review the firm discovered the sausage contains soy which is not listed on the label.
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
