CANTALOUPE, HONEY DEW, PINEAPPLE AND GRAPES (CHPG) UNDER THE FOLLOWING BRANDS…
Cut Fruit Express, Inc. recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 17 October 2012 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Cut Fruit Express, Inc processed cantaloupe that was later recalled by the supplier DFI Marketing due to a positive Salmonella sample.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
CANTALOUPE, HONEY DEW, PINEAPPLE AND GRAPES (CHPG) UNDER THE FOLLOWING BRANDS: Indianhead Foods 13105 FRUIT MIX CHPG 5# Manufactured by Cut Fruit Express Mpls, MN 55076 Following products Distributed by H. Brooks & Co. Mpls, MN 55112: H.Brooks & Company 31165 MIXED FRUIT CHPG 4/16OZ 16oz 4 per case UPC# 0 3823231165 6. Festival Foods-Best Of The Season 31165 MIXED FRUIT CHPG 4/16OZ 16oz 4 per case UPC# 0 3823231165 6. Kitchen Cravings Kwik Trip #1 31595 FRUIT CUP MIX Chunks 5.5oz 24 per case UPC# 0 3977955262 5. Kitchen Cravings Kwik Trip #31616 Fruit Tray 16 oz 12 per case UPC#0 3977955265 6. Supermom's /Super America-Goodies-to go! 31595 FRUIT MIX CHPG 5.5 oz 24 per case UPC# 76391390250 1. H.Brooks 34382 MIXED FRUIT CHPG Net Wt 8 oz(227g) 6 per case 19 UPC# 0 3823234382 4. H.Brooks 37663 FRUIT MIXED CHPG Net Wt 12oz(340g) 4 per case 175 UPC# 0 3823237663 1.
UPC
038232311656
Reason for recall
Cut Fruit Express, Inc processed cantaloupe that was later recalled by the supplier DFI Marketing due to a positive Salmonella sample.
Two or more of the following: Email, Fax, Letter, Press Release, Telephone, Visit
Product codes
Use by 9/11 - 9/14
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 9 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 9 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 9. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 9 of them.
The recall ran for 8 weeks, from 13 September 2012 to termination on 7 November 2012. Termination means the agency judged that all reasonable effort had been made, under 21 CFR 7.55, and it says nothing about whether product remained in circulation.
The distribution pattern names 3 states, and the FDA published the enforcement report 5 weeks after the firm began the recall.
Recalls of fresh produce run a median of 7 months, so this one was shorter than usual for its category. Fresh produce is the category where contamination arrives before the facility does: irrigation water, soil amendments and field workers are the routes, and nothing downstream of the farm is a kill step for a product eaten raw.
Named in the distribution pattern: Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin. Those pages count recalls by where the RECALLING FIRM sits, which is a different question from where this product went.
Salmonella is a bacterium that survives in low-moisture foods for months, which is why it appears in recalls of products that carry no water for it to grow in: nut butters, spices, flour and dry pet food.
A preventive controls plan covers Salmonella contamination under the clauses below. This is where the control belongs, not a finding against any firm named on this page: a recall record states a reason, and most of these recalls were initiated by the firm itself.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(1)
Process controls: the controls that apply a treatment, such as a validated kill step, at the point where it reduces the hazard to a safe level.
21 CFR 117 subpart G
Supply-chain programme: the approval and verification a receiving facility runs on a supplier when the hazard is controlled before the ingredient arrives.
21 CFR 117.165(a)(2)
Product testing: testing as a verification activity, appropriate to the facility, the food and the nature of the preventive control.
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food, recalled for a hazard this record also names. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
21 CFR 117.135(c)(1) is the clause behind this recall, and it is one somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
