Small Ranch Tray with Dip, NET WT, 21.9 OZ (1 lb 5.9 OZ) 620g, Dist. By: Renaissance…
Renaissance Food Group recalled this product and the FDA reported the enforcement action on 12 October 2022 as Class I. The recall was initiated by the firm. Firm received positive test results for L. monocytogenes in a finished product. All products manufactured with the same components are being recalled.
The record
Every field below is published by the FDA in the openFDA food enforcement database. Check the FDA notice before acting on any recall: this page is a reading of the public record, not a substitute for it.
Product
Small Ranch Tray with Dip, NET WT, 21.9 OZ (1 lb 5.9 OZ) 620g, Dist. By: Renaissance Food Group LLC 4322 Moreland Ave. Conley, GA 30288, UPC, 8 26766 19087 4
Reason for recall
Firm received positive test results for L. monocytogenes in a finished product. All products manufactured with the same components are being recalled.
Products were shipped to the following states: Alabama, Georgia & South Carolina.
Initiated
12 September 2022
Reported by FDA
12 October 2022
Firm notified by
E-Mail
Product codes
GHGA 254 SELL BY: 09/15/22
Reading this record
Five things about this record are not in the record itself, and each one changes how it should be read.
Class I means the FDA judged a reasonable probability that the product would cause serious health consequences or death. The class is assigned by an agency health hazard evaluation under 21 CFR 7.41, not by the firm.
The firm started this recall itself. Most FDA food recalls are voluntary, and a recall is a food safety plan working rather than failing. The circumstances in which the agency asks for one instead are set out in 21 CFR 7.45.
This is one of 24 records covering the same recall event. The FDA opens one enforcement record per product code, so a recall of a product line appears here many times. Counting these records as 24 separate recalls, which almost every published figure does, overstates it by a factor of 24. Every product code in this event is listed together on the record that covers the whole recall, which is the page a search engine is pointed to for all 24 of them.
This recall has no termination date on the record, so as published it had not been terminated under 21 CFR 7.55.
The FDA published the enforcement report 4 weeks after the firm began the recall.
Sauces and dips sit at the intersection of the acidified foods rule and the allergen rule: an equilibrium pH above 4.6 turns a shelf-stable product into a botulism risk, and the ingredient list is long enough that an allergen is easy to lose.
These are the closest records in the corpus: the same kind of food. Unlike the firm’s own records below, they come from different companies, which is what makes them a pattern rather than a history.
Behind every recall is a clause somebody has to produce evidence for at their next audit. Krolda maps supplier documents to the clause they satisfy in FSSC 22000, IFS Food and 21 CFR 117, and routes the corrective action when the evidence is missing.
Recall records come from the openFDA food enforcement API, published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the public domain. Krolda adds the hazard classification and the clause mapping; neither is an FDA determination. Always check the FDA notice before acting on a recall.
